I am trying to avoid stacking too many lugs on one battery terminal. I am looking for assurance that what I am about to do is the right way to do it. Battery bank consist of 5 Lifelines GPL-31T. With the batteries hooked in parallel and the house bank feed fused with 300 amp Class T fuse. Starter bank has its own lead and 300 amp Class T fuse. Both run to the 1-2-all switch. I will be running 140 amp alternator to house bank and solar controller output to house bank as well. Problem is I don't have enough existing 2/0 cable from house feed to run to a new fused bus bar to avoid stacking more than two lugs on a battery terminal. My thinking is to take house feed from positive side of battery and connect to bus bar. Then run new 2/0 cable from positive battery terminal through a 225 or 300 amp fuse either ANL or a terminal fuse block from Blue Seas to bus bar. The terminal fuse block kinda defeats the purpose because now I am stacking more than two lugs on a terminal. So would this be the correct way to do this? Second question is do I go with a 250 amp bus bar or do I need to go with the 600 mega bus bar. All wiring meets ampacity ratings and voltage drop is below 1% drop except alt. run which will be close to 1.5%. I realize that this diagram is very basic. I just want to help clarify my intentions.
Busbars are a very good way to neaten up battery terminals. The first fuse off the battery should be the main bank protection then into an always-on distribution busbar for alternator charger etc... This meets the minimum safety standards. The alt feed can use an MRBF mounted directly to the busbar as can a charger or solar etc.. Your position of the solar ANL is incorrect, it should be at the busbar. These fuses are to
protect the wiring from the battery.... Also any time you step down in wire size a new fuse is necessary ideally sized to not exceed the ampacity of the wire..
Your wiring is absolutely not oversized and is standard Hunter, Catalina, Beneteau, Jenneau, Sabre etc., factory wiring by
today's standards. Builders do this because they need to meet bank over current protection requirements as well as accommodate an owner for inverters, electric winches, engine starting and thrusters. It is just good practice and if you add or have a 2kW + inverter you'll be very happy the builder did not cut corners
like they used to. The 2kW Magnum inverter I installed 4 weeks ago requires a
bare minimum (the smallest allowable) of 2/0 wire and a 300A Class T fuse. Heck just to start engines I like to see a bare minimum of 250A but much more preferably 300A. You can't really do this with 2GA or 4GA wire and meet the safety standards. Hunter did not oversize your wiring
they did the right thing.
As for the position of the alt fuse it is really pretty irrelevant, if the fuses are sized correctly. Seeing as you've already removed the number 1 voltage transient reason, and that is controlling alt source selection via a battery switch, you're in much better hands by feeding it direct to a bank.
Even with the slew of blown diodes in alts I repair each year, all of which threw a huge spike into the DC system because the alt was directly connected to the "C" post of the switch, the same place the DC loads are wired to, I see very, very few electronics failures even on boats that literally blew the diodes out of the alt by disconnecting or open circuiting the bank from the alt all while leaving it directly connected to the DC loads.. If you are overly concerned about that simply mount an alt MRBF to the battery side of the Class T. I would not lose sleep over it....