I didn't want to hijack the "Survey Botch?" thread so I posted this new one....
With one exception, I have always purchased trailer sailboats. I have gotten quite a few of them in very bad shape and enjoyed bringing them back to life.... I'm now working on my 7th restoration...but I've never gotten a survey. I just read a few "how to" books before I started on this.
The wisdom often expressed on this thread (and in all of the "how to buy a sailboat" books I've ever read) is that it is imperative that you get a boat survey before buying....
So in my mind I've always figured that if I ever buy a decent sailboat ($$$), I'd go ahead and fork over the survey cost... Conventional wisdom (right?)
BUT! When reading the "survey botch?" thread there was a clear theme expressed by many.... surveyors often miss stuff and can't be counted on to do a great job.
Well if true that is disturbing and counter intuitive (and seems to go against the conventional wisdom)...:neutral:
So I want to pose this question and see if I can find the line in this discrepancy. Is the idea that a "survey is essential" predicated on the assumption that the buyer is unfamiliar with boat fabrication/systems? Or are their other considerations at play. I'm not trying to say people who get surveys done are ignorant about boats so don't flame me ... and admittedly my project boats have represented a lot less "skin in the game" than other boat owners have in play... but after having restored 6 sailboats, I feel fairly confident that I can inspect a hull and deck for delamination and soft spots .... and I can inspect a keel and keel bolts, gudgeon and pintles etc. I even feel fairly confident in inspecting rigging and electrical....
... on the other hand, I don't know much about diesel engines and would want that (at the very minimum) looked over by someone who knows a lot more about it than I know.
So if you have strong opinions (one way or the other), about the value of a survey, I'd love to hear your reasons. I'm not picking sides. I just want to see other people's logic stream ...
Thanks,
r
With one exception, I have always purchased trailer sailboats. I have gotten quite a few of them in very bad shape and enjoyed bringing them back to life.... I'm now working on my 7th restoration...but I've never gotten a survey. I just read a few "how to" books before I started on this.
The wisdom often expressed on this thread (and in all of the "how to buy a sailboat" books I've ever read) is that it is imperative that you get a boat survey before buying....
So in my mind I've always figured that if I ever buy a decent sailboat ($$$), I'd go ahead and fork over the survey cost... Conventional wisdom (right?)
BUT! When reading the "survey botch?" thread there was a clear theme expressed by many.... surveyors often miss stuff and can't be counted on to do a great job.
So I want to pose this question and see if I can find the line in this discrepancy. Is the idea that a "survey is essential" predicated on the assumption that the buyer is unfamiliar with boat fabrication/systems? Or are their other considerations at play. I'm not trying to say people who get surveys done are ignorant about boats so don't flame me ... and admittedly my project boats have represented a lot less "skin in the game" than other boat owners have in play... but after having restored 6 sailboats, I feel fairly confident that I can inspect a hull and deck for delamination and soft spots .... and I can inspect a keel and keel bolts, gudgeon and pintles etc. I even feel fairly confident in inspecting rigging and electrical....
... on the other hand, I don't know much about diesel engines and would want that (at the very minimum) looked over by someone who knows a lot more about it than I know.
So if you have strong opinions (one way or the other), about the value of a survey, I'd love to hear your reasons. I'm not picking sides. I just want to see other people's logic stream ...
Thanks,
r