K
Ken Cobb
As a result of a discussion on seaworthiness of boats on the "ask all sailors" board at this site, I was directed to some technical articles about the topic. The two indicators that seem to come up a lot are the length to displacement formula and the capsize risk formula. To summarize both, boats that are heavier for their length, and narrower in the beam, come out the best on both formulas.My point for Beneteau owners is this: The 361 and 393 come out worse in those formulas than the comparably sized Hunters and Catalinas, basically because the Beneteaus don't have as much displacement for their size. This should make Beneteaus the fastest cruisers around, but it also suggests that the 361 and 393 should not be taken on blue water passages. Thoughts or comments?