
Endurance: Shackleton's lost ship is found in Antarctic
What was one of the world's greatest undiscovered shipwrecks is identified on the Antarctic seafloor.
www.bbc.com
Are you saying Shackleton knowingly embarked at a less than ideal time?The story is an amazing read. Had he been able to control his ego, they might have sailed under better conditions and been successful.
Yep. It's part of the tragic story.Are you saying Shackleton knowingly embarked at a less than ideal time?
It was a race to be the first. Eve of World War One. Others are seeking the glory of first to discover. The Antarctic is the last left mystery of the 20th Century.Are you saying Shackleton knowingly embarked at a less than ideal time?
That was a huge factor.Eve of World War One.
If it was a modern ship with fuel leaking I would agree. But since contamination is likely not an issue now, due to it being a steam powered ship I can't see the problem ?It certainly is not environmentally beneficial to leave it there
I was talking with a diver yesterday. Took up the hobby when the quality of fishing declined. Said he dove on a wreck in the Georgia Strait not far from Nanaimo. Said it was the coldest 20 minutes in his life. Now he dives off the Hawaiian Islands.If anyone wants to dive down
Interesting read... but I still contend that this is a case of "we don't want you to have it so nobody can have it.".
Assuming it was possible to retrieve it, more or less intact from 10,000ft down, and bring it to the UK, I doubt the cost would justify the small museum fees that people would pay.I, for one, would love to see that sitting in a museum semi (or fully) restored.
At best they would haul parts up, like the ships wheel, bell etc.
I don’t know much about the treaty but when Titanic was found Ballard wanted it “left alone” out of respect (so claimed) for those who suffered the tragedy and died when the ship went down. International salvagers did not see it way, however. No one died on the Shackleton expedition, so no need for the reverence. Great story of the voyage in the books, but it did not produce much of an enduring nature. Bring it up and put it on display for posterity if anyone really wishes to, IMHO.So, I'm not sure I understand the logic of an international treaty that leaves shipwrecks alone. It certainly is not environmentally beneficial to leave it there and it does not enhance our understanding of history or anything else for that matter to leave it there. This smacks of…. “I don’t want you to have it so lets agree we both can’t have it”.
Help me understand this.
It’s similar to the stuff you read here. A ship is never really “ready.” “Just go.”Yep. It's part of the tragic story.
The Antarctic Treaty rules have nothing to do with reverence.No one died on the Shackleton expedition, so no need for the reverence.
She's at a shallower depth than the Titanic but in a much more inhospitable place, so any attempt at recovery now would likely be difficult and expensive. I can't see it making any financial sense unless some billionaire has a Shackleton fetish, and is willing to try get special international permission to do recovery.Bring it up and put it on display for posterity if anyone really wishes to, IMHO.