J
John Ehricht
Our Hunter 36 came from the factory with the standard Raymarine St40 depth and speed and no other Raymarine electronics. We opted for the Raymarine C-80 chartplotter, the 4000 autopilot, the ST60 Wind, the ST-60 speed and depth. We were informed by Raymarine that if we ran a cable from the C-80 to the cabin, we could interface with our laptop computer if we bought their Raytech software. The Raytech was delayed coming out. Then, our instruments were not installed correctly and we found out from the authorized Raymarine dealer that he knew and the Hunter dealer kew that they were not installed correctly, but because the Hunter dealer said that he did not care and did not want to pay to have it done correctly, then we just had the problem. We tried to get the Raymarine dealer to fix the problems and agreed to pay him, but its New Orleans and he refused. What can we say. The Big Easy is a big Rat's Nest. Anyway, we contacted West Marine and they referred us to a very competent "non authorized" installer who did reinstall everything correctly. When it came to the C-80 laptop interface, he consulted with Raymarine directly and installed a seatalk interface which worked, except that the capability to make transfers of waypoints and routs did not work. Of course this was the major reason we purchased the Raytech software and incurred the expense of having the interface in the first place and we were never informed of these limitations when we agreed to purchase all of the equipment and the software. Then, Raymarine told us that if we wanted this capability we would need a NEMA interface as oppsed to the seatlk interface and they would give us nothing for the expenses we had incurred for installing the seatalk interface which they told us to do, but never informed us of the limitations. Now we have the NEMA interface and the S-60 wind does not show up on the laptop(however, it did when we had the seatalk interface) because Raymarine says that it will not work with NEMA(but they did not inform us of this limitation when they told us that we would have to use NEMA if we wanted to make transfers). A Tech at Raymarine said that he was not happy with the fact that all of the raymarine gear associated with a C-80 had to work with NEMA and not seatalk and that he was trying to get this changed so that it would work with seatalk. Of course if this happens, then we would incur the expense on changing back to seatalk(again all our expense). Then another Tech person informed us that they were about to release a new version of the "firware" to go on the C-80 which would allow the wind information to appear on the laptop in the Raytech software. Anyway, if this ever gets figured out it will be great, but why can't they do it before the end user has to have all of these problems and incur all of these needless expenses? Has anyone else had any experience with this? We will appreciate your comments!