Having used all three of those mounts..
I've owned three boats with it on the mast, one with a Questus and one, my current boat, with a radar pole.My short answer or suggestion is to mast mount! I've had consistently better performance with higher domes! Furthermore, the difference between my very expensive Questus and my somewhat expensive fixed, not gimbaled, stern "pole" is negligible if any and yes we do sail in the fog.I will eventually remove my current stern pole and go with a mast mounted radome again for better performance. While some will argue the "weight aloft" point of view I look at it as a safety measure. In Maine you need radar performance because the lobstermen rarely, if ever, look at theirs. In even 10 foot seas I've completely lost targets with stern mounted radar. Not good... I'll surely trade a little weigh aloft for performance related to safety any day of the week. Two summers ago on our vacation we used our radar 15 out of 18 days so radar is generally considered serious business on the foggy Maine coast. If you're bay sailing only a stern pole will work but do get the highest possible pole you can. For off shore the mast mount, and I currently have a stern pole so I'm not preaching the religion I have and use here, is the better choice.The Questus was a beautifully built piece of equipment but I honestly can't say I noticed any "real" significant difference even under sail. In theory it's a nice sounding idea in the real world however the stated performance gains did not add up for me..Mast Mount Pros: Performance, & less expensive installation if you already have your mast down.Mast Mount Cons: Splicing the wire, access (some complain of head sails getting caught but I've personally never had that happen.Stern Pole Pros: Access, good place to mount a second anchor light & GPS antennas or a cockpit light.Stern Pole Cons: Performance, high initial cost, aesthetics (though this is personal preference), tricky to install on many boats..