I recently purchased a Ranger 23, hull# 505 (1975), which had been left at the previous owners dock for 10 yrs. Sounds scary, I know. So far, its not nearly as bad as I had thought it was going to be when I got into it. Only big projects on the boat are the wooden parts of the bulkheads were completely rotten and, though i haven't hauled yet, I'm sure after being in brackish water for that long that the bottom needs a good amount of attention. Though I'm moving right along on the project and going to be replacing the wood and also "beefing" them up with fiberglass rather than just tabbing the pieces in like done previously. Where I'm finding I want a second opinion on the matter, or to see if anyone else has done this, is with this idea:
(I'm going to talk about the following as though someone who is familiar with the bulkhead system in the R23 is reading. Any questions, I'll be glad to answer)
The chainplate comes down and attaches lower than the top piece of plywood bulkhead, into the fiberglass of the cabin staging. What I'm planning is instead of replacing the top bulkhead piece for "anchoring" the chainplate, I'm going to instead create greater support to where the chainplate anchors to fiberglass and build stronger deck support columns that are paired at the "doorway" under the mast. This would open the cabin more and from I can tell, neither the deck or the chainplate really get much support from that top piece of ply. Rather, the support seems to come from both posts and the real load-bearing anchoring of the chainplate is lower within the cabinetry/cabin staging.
Don't get me wrong, I'm all for "if it works, don't fix it" and I've actually been labelled a traditionalist in other projects I've done. However, I'm going to be racing and just doing weekend warrior cruises. If the boat doesn't need all the wood, I don't want it. When it comes to outfitting a boat, I lean towards being a minimalist. I'd love to have more open airflow in the cabin, but create a stronger support for mast compression. (I will also be using a removable compression post as past R23 races have advised.)
Has anyone who owns a Ranger done this or also looked at it that way? I'm very acceptable of criticism also, so please, anyone with knowledge of this sort of project, reply away.
(I'm going to talk about the following as though someone who is familiar with the bulkhead system in the R23 is reading. Any questions, I'll be glad to answer)
The chainplate comes down and attaches lower than the top piece of plywood bulkhead, into the fiberglass of the cabin staging. What I'm planning is instead of replacing the top bulkhead piece for "anchoring" the chainplate, I'm going to instead create greater support to where the chainplate anchors to fiberglass and build stronger deck support columns that are paired at the "doorway" under the mast. This would open the cabin more and from I can tell, neither the deck or the chainplate really get much support from that top piece of ply. Rather, the support seems to come from both posts and the real load-bearing anchoring of the chainplate is lower within the cabinetry/cabin staging.
Don't get me wrong, I'm all for "if it works, don't fix it" and I've actually been labelled a traditionalist in other projects I've done. However, I'm going to be racing and just doing weekend warrior cruises. If the boat doesn't need all the wood, I don't want it. When it comes to outfitting a boat, I lean towards being a minimalist. I'd love to have more open airflow in the cabin, but create a stronger support for mast compression. (I will also be using a removable compression post as past R23 races have advised.)
Has anyone who owns a Ranger done this or also looked at it that way? I'm very acceptable of criticism also, so please, anyone with knowledge of this sort of project, reply away.