Diffrences
Just so you are aware Dick,Long shaft is better then a short shaft hands down. Reason being, with a short shaft, the prop is near the top of the water. You run into the problem of the prop sucking in air from the surface and loosing it's bite. The longer the shaft, the deeper the prop, and the less chance of this happening. Short shafts are more for aluminum fishing boats.Can you use one? Yeah...can you rely on it when you really need it? Probably not. Just when you need to race the engine to avoid something, the prop is going to pull in air and you'll loose your bite on the water.The problem with the long shafts, is that often, the motormount won't lift it completely out of the water. This is fine, if you don't mind the small amount of noise and drag created by the prop spinning free with the engine in neutral. The diffrence between 2 and 4 strokes, besides the internal functions is torque vs. RPM. This equates to power vs. speed.A two stroke has it's power at high rpms, and a four has it at low rpms. If you wanted speed, you'd opt for a two stroke. As a sailboat will never get past hull speed because it can't plane, this is of no concern. The torque of a four stroke on the other hand, gives the engine a lot more push. It will preform better in heavy weather when pushing against waves, current, etc.The problem with 2 stroke motormounts is they aren't built to handle the torque of a four. A four pushes a lot harder, and therefore puts much more strain on that bracket. If you can afford it, get a new bracket. If you can't, a safe bet is to use a four stroke no larger then 75% the rating of the bracket. If the bracket is ancient, say OEM on a 1975, I wouldn't go even 50% on it. It may already be suffering stress fatigue. Also, try not to accellerate too quickly, this puts less strain on the bracket.Josh