Drawbacks to midships cockpits.
One of the most glaring disadvantages to a centre-cockpit layout is that one of the most fertile areas of the boat, the third quarter of length, is hogged up by the cockpit well. This tends to make a discrete aft-cabin with jacuzzi, queen berth, etc., look very desirable but in reality, believe it or not, it's a loss of space. The cockpit never needs to be as wide as the full beam of the boat and a sleeping cabin could make better use of the space farther forward.I have never seen a centre-cockpit aft-cabin yawl under about 60 ft. It just does not seem like it'd work to me.The arguments of higher centre of gravity and associated loss of righting moment can be proved with fact though many owners may choose to disregard that because they quite understandably do not notice. Passages from forward to aft below do not really gain full headroom before about 50 feet unless some sacrifice is made in looks and safety by increasing freeboard and superstructure. Steering gear IS more complicated with at least one or two more sets of sheaves and that much more likelihood of a cable jumping one. The seaworthiness of a centre cockpit is often assumed to be superior (surely the dodgers may fit nicer), but the problem arises when it DOES get pooped-- what then? If you can take a scary amount of water into THAT part of the boat you have got a REAL problem on your hands (and up to your knees!).I have always believed that the worst problem is the crew's view of the sails. It is next to impossible to accomplish the best possible sail trim, slots shape, sail shape, and so forth from the position of being directly UNDER the main boom. Being able to see the sails more horizontally than vertically can only help. This is probably why so many mid-cockpit boats may be seen with some guy leaning back on the stern pulpit tailing the jib sheets or calling directions forward.My dad, the designer, never one to mince words, despised centre-cockpit boats, often saying they resembled a play-pen!JC