I plan to replace my thru-hull valves and fittings this winter and have decided to go with the Forespar Marelon OEM 93 series. On my current 3/4" engine intake thru-hull valve there is a Groco engine flush fitting that allows me to connect a section of garden hose for antifreeze intake when winterizing. I like having this capability and very much want to preserve it going forward.
I’ve found that Forespar makes an engine-flush version of the 93 series but the smallest size available is 1”. Are there any potential downsides to using the 1” valve and a 1” hose to the engine strainer and then using reducers to step down to 3/4” at the strainer intake? Alternatively I could keep the Groco fitting and adapt it to work with a 3/4” series 93 valve – but then I’d be mixing bronze and Marelon.
I’ve found that Forespar makes an engine-flush version of the 93 series but the smallest size available is 1”. Are there any potential downsides to using the 1” valve and a 1” hose to the engine strainer and then using reducers to step down to 3/4” at the strainer intake? Alternatively I could keep the Groco fitting and adapt it to work with a 3/4” series 93 valve – but then I’d be mixing bronze and Marelon.