CNG lighter than air; LPG heavier than air
We love cruising the Great Lakes and Canadian North Channel and Georgian Bay in our '87 Ericson 32 which came outfitted with CNG. We too have been tempted to convert to LPG because of the much more economic refueling ($15 vs. $75) and much easier availability of LPG as compared to CNG but every time the thought comes up, we remind ourselves that CNG is lighter than air whereas LPG is heavier. A boat's hull is a relatively gas tight container from the gunnels down to the keel but not very gas tight from the gunnels up to the cabin top with its dorades, openable port holes and hatches and a sliding companionway lid. We feel much more comfortable sleeping with the knowledge that should a gas leak occur with CNG, the natural gas will rise to the ceiling and find its way out through the vents rather than hang low down in the hull near the floor and berths posing an asphixiation and potential explosion hazard. For this peace of mind, we are willing to pay an extra $60 per season (or two) and put up with the hassle of having to schedule delivery of our replacement gas bottles, with the local marina, ahead of time (most marinas don't carry a CNG bottle inventory). On our 32, the SCUBA tank like configuration of the CNG tank packages neatly and out of the way on its own rack on a shelf just under the outer deck, adjacent to the starboard side of the cockpit, handily accessible through the starboard lazerette. For cruise departures with the main CNG tank pressure already getting low, it would seem that an extra CNG tank would be easier to stow safely on board than an LPG bottle. We're staying with CNG.