I think this depends on the individual dealing with the situation. I use the singular because it has not happened to me in a setting where I had to involve others to solve the problem (though others were affected by my decisions and actions). I was also surreally calm in the two potentially life-threatening situations I had to deal with (an engine failure in a single engine airplane, and becoming stuck in an oddly-shaped swim through while scuba diving). Psychologists say that when confronted with a threat, your perception narrows to focus on the threat, and I think this can be both good and bad. Training and preparation (do you always play "what would I do if"?) have a lot to do with the outcome, and calmness is always helpful. On the other hand, how do you train for the chain of events that can happen in a storm at sea?I’ve never experienced this but when the supposed tried and true storm tactic blows up, what’s next? What is the emotional impact on the crew? Or are the demands of survival so urgent that emotions are suppressed . In the situation I was in most danger on a sailboat I was strangely calm. I just wanted it to be over.
It sounded like it was the furling line that parted which then caused the head sail to unfurl in 85 knot winds. A buddy of mine replaced his roller furling head sail with hank on and a sturdy down haul before setting off to go long distance cruising. I thought it odd but this is the kind of situation where that could really have paid off.When things go wrong in a survival situation it tends to lead to a snowballing series of problems.
None of them significant under normal conditions, but as seen here the simple parting of a sheet on a roller furling foresail was almost fatal.
I can sit back and say the should have had both sheets cleated off, or they should have had a locking mechanism on the furling drum.
All I can really do is to learn as much as I can from their accident and try to end up in the same hole.
gary
Wish I could put some citations in this post but I heard all of this on a pod cast and have no idea how well vetted this theory really is… so with that said I heard that functional MRI experiments have shown that the male half of the human species has fewer connections between the left and right side of the brain than does the female half. Some evolutionary anthropologist speculate that this differentiation helps the human race in two ways. Women are more socially attuned and are more equipped to help “keep the peace” and ensure the equitable distribution of resources. Men are better equipped to shut down the emotional side of the brain and this can be very beneficial in a crisis. It is also why men seem more susceptible to PTSD.I think this depends on the individual dealing with the situation. I use the singular because it has not happened to me in a setting where I had to involve others to solve the problem (though others were affected by my decisions and actions). I was also surreally calm in the two potentially life-threatening situations I had to deal with (an engine failure in a single engine airplane, and becoming stuck in an oddly-shaped swim through while scuba diving). Psychologists say that when confronted with a threat, your perception narrows to focus on the threat, and I think this can be both good and bad. Training and preparation (do you always play "what would I do if"?) have a lot to do with the outcome, and calmness is always helpful. On the other hand, how do you train for the chain of events that can happen in a storm at sea?
And yes, I think emotions are suppressed when facing survival decisions, if you are calm. Perhaps in such scenarios calm is defined as remaining emotionless, so it may be a chicken or the egg question.
Need a plan B. In listening to their story on my boat tied safely in my slip, I can think about other options if read about and discussed with other sailors.but when the supposed tried and true storm tactic blows up, what’s next?