Anyone want to share their experiences sailing both Lake Superior (especially the Canadian shore) AND Lake Huron's North Channel?
I'm considering my cruising options for the 2013 season on the Great Lakes, and am considering exploring Lake Superior. I've not really done much cruising at all on Lake Superior other than a few days in the Apostles on a charter boat. My boat is based in Milwaukee, WI, so just getting to Sault Ste Marie is several days. I'm not sure I want to do an all-out circumnavigation, but I figure I should probably at least spend some time in the Apostles and Isle Royale. What about the north (Canadian) shore?
I've cruised Lake Huron's North Channel twice now and loved it... wilderness, beauty, lots of destinations, and nice sailing. Being based in Milwaukee, the North Channel is also generally closer to home than most places I think I'd go on Lake Superior, so there's less "delivery" time. But how does the scenery compare between the two areas?
I know many cruising destinations on Lake Superior are much farther apart, and the weather is more extreme, which basically means more preparation is necessary and the "getting there" part can be much more of a challenge. Some of this challenge sounds pretty cool, though, and going somewhere new would be exciting! If you've cruised both areas, have you found the extra challenges on Lake Superior are worth it over cruising the North Channel?
Chances are I'd plan on spending all of August and most of September cruising... which gives me about 5-6 weeks starting at Sault Ste Marie after subtracting delivery time to and from Milwaukee.
What say ye? I'm looking for advice like:
"Lake Superior is a lot of work and not that much prettier than the North Channel," or
"Lake Superior is 10 times more challenging but 10 times better so DO IT!"
Which area do you like better and why? Or do you think this comparison is like apples and oranges? Thanks!
I'm considering my cruising options for the 2013 season on the Great Lakes, and am considering exploring Lake Superior. I've not really done much cruising at all on Lake Superior other than a few days in the Apostles on a charter boat. My boat is based in Milwaukee, WI, so just getting to Sault Ste Marie is several days. I'm not sure I want to do an all-out circumnavigation, but I figure I should probably at least spend some time in the Apostles and Isle Royale. What about the north (Canadian) shore?
I've cruised Lake Huron's North Channel twice now and loved it... wilderness, beauty, lots of destinations, and nice sailing. Being based in Milwaukee, the North Channel is also generally closer to home than most places I think I'd go on Lake Superior, so there's less "delivery" time. But how does the scenery compare between the two areas?
I know many cruising destinations on Lake Superior are much farther apart, and the weather is more extreme, which basically means more preparation is necessary and the "getting there" part can be much more of a challenge. Some of this challenge sounds pretty cool, though, and going somewhere new would be exciting! If you've cruised both areas, have you found the extra challenges on Lake Superior are worth it over cruising the North Channel?
Chances are I'd plan on spending all of August and most of September cruising... which gives me about 5-6 weeks starting at Sault Ste Marie after subtracting delivery time to and from Milwaukee.
What say ye? I'm looking for advice like:
"Lake Superior is a lot of work and not that much prettier than the North Channel," or
"Lake Superior is 10 times more challenging but 10 times better so DO IT!"
Which area do you like better and why? Or do you think this comparison is like apples and oranges? Thanks!