All
I don't want to shut off any further postings (not that I could anyway!), but thanks for the replies so far. Averaging the 4 posts with what I read in the archives (which only occurred to me after the fact, and much of which is a few years old) I'm gathering is that it's close, but doable.To Warren M: I'm not sure I agree about the comment on the POD charts. My understanding is that they contain the same info as any NOAA chart: you just get it more quickly, and it contains all the collected "notice to mariners" information up to the week in which you had your chart printed. They are a commercial product sponsored by NOAA and populated with NOAA provided data. So the question is: is 3 ft. reported at MLLW consistent with what people have observed below? Seems pretty reasonable that there would be shallow spots on the order of 4-5 feet at a time which isn't MLLW, and this would explain Harry's first-hand observation of a small boat going aground.Anyway, I haven't decided yet whether I feel comfortable with trying the narrows with our 3'10" draft next week. Besides the draft, there's the issue of the current and the bascule bridge. I'm planning our first 5-day cruise with the family. At the moment, the plan is roughly: 1) Rock Creek on the Patapsco to Selby Bay on S. River2) Selby to St. Michaels3) St. Michaels to Rock Hall4) Rock Hall to home.Leg 3 would be more manageable in 1 day via Kent Narrows (23 miles) than via Bloody Pt (35 miles), given that my family isn't quite as keen as I am about the sailing part, vs. the land-based part. Any comments on the itinerary are also welcome, of course.I very much appreciate your help and comments!Jay