Is this coupler ok?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Bazzer

.
Feb 4, 2009
30
2 Newport 30 Benica
This is the coupler on our Newport that the Surveyor reported two weeks ago as "Good" Now it looks like we will have to haul the boat again to get it replaced. Will I ever learn?
Bazzer
 

Attachments

Jun 2, 2004
5,802
Hunter 37-cutter, '79 41 23' 30"N 82 33' 20"W--------Huron, OH
Yep, that's ugly! Also looks like your packing gland is right up against it. If that is so then there is more work to do. Probably not, but what is that up against the coupler?
 

Bazzer

.
Feb 4, 2009
30
2 Newport 30 Benica
Yep, that's ugly! Also looks like your packing gland is right up against it. If that is so then there is more work to do. Probably not, but what is that up against the coupler?
Not much room I agree. The engine is not the original Atomic but now a Universal. I'm going to remove the shaft and reduce it's length, it's about 5 inches too long at the cutless bearing. The gearbox has a problem as well that's likely to need overhaul.
The coupler is so badly corroded that if you hit it with a hammer it's likely to fall apart. One of the lock bolts is spinning....
 

RAD

.
Jun 3, 2004
2,330
Catalina 30 Bay Shore, N.Y.
Looks like the stuffing box has been leaking all over that coupling can you shorten the shaft log hose so a Little more shaft is showing so you can see if is leaking when adjusting
I'd take a saw to that coupling to remove it in a hurry
 
Jun 2, 2004
5,802
Hunter 37-cutter, '79 41 23' 30"N 82 33' 20"W--------Huron, OH
So it is the stuffing box? Then Rad has one idea, a shorter log hose is stronger anyway IF there is room to shorten it. Is there room to move the engine forward on the rails? I'd look into that option before shortening the shaft. And a flexible shaft saver, about 1/2" in thickness would be cheap insurance. But you will need the space.
 

Attachments

Ray T

.
Jan 24, 2008
224
Hunter 216 West End - Seven Lakes
There is quite a bit of meat to these couplings. From your picture it looks like it might be surface corrosion. You can chip around on the coupling to get some idea as to how deep it goes. If its not too deep I think I would put it on my to do list for the next time I hauled the boat. Of more concern to me would be how close the packing gland is to the coupling. If its rubbing, that's not good. If your packing gland can stand tightening that's what I would do for a little more clearance.
 

Bazzer

.
Feb 4, 2009
30
2 Newport 30 Benica
So it is the stuffing box? Then Rad has one idea, a shorter log hose is stronger anyway IF there is room to shorten it. Is there room to move the engine forward on the rails? I'd look into that option before shortening the shaft. And a flexible shaft saver, about 1/2" in thickness would be cheap insurance. But you will need the space.
Yes, the hose can be shortened quite a bit. The shaft extends beyond the cutless bearing by about six inches, no vibration but definitely to long. If I have to haul the boat then I will get it shortened. The engine can't be moved forward, but the gearbox will also have to come out. Again, the surveyor missed the fact that there was no oil in it! Now it jumps out of forward gear. I wish mine looked like yours Ed. What kind of anti-vibration coupling are you using?
Bazzer
 

Bazzer

.
Feb 4, 2009
30
2 Newport 30 Benica
There is quite a bit of meat to these couplings. From your picture it looks like it might be surface corrosion. You can chip around on the coupling to get some idea as to how deep it goes. If its not too deep I think I would put it on my to do list for the next time I hauled the boat. Of more concern to me would be how close the packing gland is to the coupling. If its rubbing, that's not good. If your packing gland can stand tightening that's what I would do for a little more clearance.
There is at least 1/4 inch of corrosion on the surface of the coupling, more than I am comfortable with. One of the lock nut female threads is striped as well.
Bazzer
 

Ross

.
Jun 15, 2004
14,693
Islander/Wayfairer 30 sail number 25 Perryville,Md.
Change the coupling. Add a "Drive saver" brand flex coupling interface. Move the engine forward if at all possible. The people that changed the engine should have.
 
Feb 6, 1998
11,760
Canadian Sailcraft 36T Casco Bay, ME
You've got

You've got some good advice thus far. Here are a few things out of the ABYC P-6 prop shafting standard to be aware of when re-assembling everything (this is not law but a good minimum standard to follow):

6.5.5.4 The distance between the forward end of the
propeller hub and the aft end of the last strut bearing shall
be limited to one shaft diameter.

6.5.5.3.1 Alignment shall be accomplished with the boat
floating.

6.5.5.3 Bearings, shaft, and couplings shall be aligned to
a tolerance of no more than .004 in. (.102 mm) measured
between the parallel flange of the coupling with the
coupling bolts loose.

6.5.5.2 If a non-conductive flexible coupling is used, an
alternative means of grounding the shaft must be provided.

6.7.1 Shaft seals shall be readily accessible.

6.7.3 If a shaft seal utilizing replaceable packing
material is installed in the boat, it shall have clearance
along the shaft line to permit replacement of the packing
without uncoupling the shaft or moving the engine.

P.S. I'm very surprised any surveyor would not have picked up on missing seizing wire on the coupling set screws???
 
Sep 25, 2008
2,288
C30 Event Horizon Port Aransas
I agree that 6" past the cutlass is too far out there. One thing to watch out for is your prop clearance with a shorter shaft. The PO may have used a longer shaft to allow for a larger diameter prop. The coupler is toast but they aren't that expensive; not in the light of a boat haul anyway. Tightening the nut will not move the packing gland enough to make a difference. The packing gland should be tightened only to adjust the drip. If you tighten it to move it away from your coupling and it is adjusted properly already then you will burn up your shaft.
IMHO, moving the engine would be the last thing I would do to make clearance. I would shorten the stuffing box hose as much as possibe and if that wasn't enough I would see if a custom made coupling could give a little more room. I just had a stainless coupling made, I think it cost twice what I could have got a regular one for though, like $140.
Look up an article Maine Sail did about teff gel. I haven't got my shaft and coupler installed yet but when I do in the next month I will definitely use teff gel.
 

BobM

.
Jun 10, 2004
3,269
S2 9.2A Winthrop, MA
Suggestions

Do yourself a favor. Do it yourself and replace everything...coupler (I suggest a split coupler for easier mounting and removal), shaft, hose, cutless bearing and stuffing. The stuffing box looks pretty good, but lots of proponents of dripless boxes here, so consider it.

I had all my stuff reconditioned by a marine machine shop. Nice work, but new was essentially the same price.

Pressing your shaft out of the coupler ala Good Old Boat, works fine, but is time consuming. Cutting things out and tossing them (after you measure them of course) will be faster, but you will need the right equipment to cut through the coupling. I thought about trying to cut the shaft, but was told it is much tougher to cut through.
 
Feb 6, 1998
11,760
Canadian Sailcraft 36T Casco Bay, ME
I thought about trying to cut the shaft, but was told it is much tougher to cut through.
4 1/2" angle grinder, a Norton, or similar, metal grade cut off disc and about 30 seconds....;)
 

Bazzer

.
Feb 4, 2009
30
2 Newport 30 Benica
4 1/2" angle grinder, a Norton, or similar, metal grade cut off disc and about 30 seconds....;)
Got one, and since the hose and shaft both need shortening, not a problem. The only problem is that I have to lift the boat high enough to remove the Rudder.
Bazzer
 
Feb 6, 1998
11,760
Canadian Sailcraft 36T Casco Bay, ME
The only problem is that I have to lift the boat high enough to remove the Rudder.
Bazzer
Only of you are on asphalt. If your over dirt you simply dig a hole to drop the rudder into..
 
Sep 29, 2008
1,980
Catalina 310 #185 Quantico
Shaft Coupler May be OK

Even though it is ugly and rusted it may be fine. Your statement that one of the locking bolts spins indicates it is stripped out and that may be cause to replace the coupling. I also agree that you may want to reduce the length of the tube or move the engine forward as you have too little clearance there. Shame on the surveyor - "good" sounds like a CMA statement. The recommendation for a shaft coupler is a good one - I put a PYI coupler on mine that I am very happy with.
 
May 6, 2004
916
Hunter 37C Seattle
If you are not going to cut the shaft off, then first step is to remove/drill out the locking bolts on the sides and get going with your soaking of PB Blaster squirted in the holes.
 

shorty

.
Apr 14, 2005
298
Pearson P34 Mt Desert, ME
Surveyors

I had a similar experience four years ago. Surveyor poo poo'd rudder play at shaft. Replaced rudder the next year. Caveat emptor w/surveyors.
 
Oct 7, 2009
15
Hunter 376 Drayden, MD
ABYC Prop shafting standard

You've got some good advice thus far. Here are a few things out of the ABYC P-6 prop shafting standard to be aware of when re-assembling everything (this is not law but a good minimum standard to follow):
---
Thanks for providing this info. I'm installing a flex coupling in my boat now and have been debating whether or not to ground across it. Are these ABYC standards available online or at reasonable cost?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.