As you may remember my mast on my 361 from 2001 broke in a nice 20 knt wind. It happened in France where the boat in insured. The company had the boat examined by an expert, who found, that it was a well maintained boat, but the riggen had not been changed after 10 years which is normal procedure.
So they will not pay, which I find very unfair. At a minimum they should pay all dogging and wages and some percentage of the price for mast, rigging and sails.
In Benneteau´s manual they do not state, that it is a part of normal maintenance to change the rigging after 10 years (could have been an attachment to the mast, so do they find, that you also have to change that each 10 years?).
Bringing the case to court is tedious and expensive, so we will try to state our opinions to the insurance company and inform them, that we will bring the case to the consumer insurance complaint organisation.
If you have any good ideas or experiences, then I would be happy for some input. Thanks. Claus.
So they will not pay, which I find very unfair. At a minimum they should pay all dogging and wages and some percentage of the price for mast, rigging and sails.
In Benneteau´s manual they do not state, that it is a part of normal maintenance to change the rigging after 10 years (could have been an attachment to the mast, so do they find, that you also have to change that each 10 years?).
Bringing the case to court is tedious and expensive, so we will try to state our opinions to the insurance company and inform them, that we will bring the case to the consumer insurance complaint organisation.
If you have any good ideas or experiences, then I would be happy for some input. Thanks. Claus.