Unskilled and Unaware of it
Peter Suah wrote,
"He who knows not, and knows not that he knows not,...."
That reminds me of a study I came across a few years ago by a couple of Cornell University researchers entitled "Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments". It was actually an amusing read.
One of their studies involved determining people's self assessments of their ability to judge what is or is not funny. Here's their description of the study:
"Materials: We created a 30-item questionnaire made up of jokes we
felt were of varying comedic value. Jokes were taken from Woody Allen
(1975), Al Frankin (1992), and a book of "really silly" pet jokes by Jeff
Rovin (1996). To assess joke quality, we contacted several professional
comedians via electronic mail and asked them to rate each joke on a scale
ranging from 1 (not at all funny) to 11 (very funny). Eight comedians
responded to our request (Bob Crawford, Costaki Economopoulos, Paul
Frisbie, Kathleen Madigan, Ann Rose, Allan Sitterson, David Spark, and
Dan St. Paul).
...
Expert ratings revealed that jokes ranged from the not so funny (e.g.,
"Question: What is big as a man, but weighs nothing? Answer: His
shadow." Mean expert rating = 1.3) to the very funny (e.g., "If a kid asks
where rain comes from, I think a cute thing to tell him is 'God is crying.'
And if he asks why God is crying, another cute thing to tell him is
'probably because of something you did.'" Mean expert rating = 9.6)."
A PDF of the paper can be found here: