Too heavy, too powerful, too short...
Don't do it! There are previous discussions in the archives, but I just bought a new motor last spring, and here's my humble opinion:The 170 is only rated for 2.5 HP - I use a Tohatsu 2-stroke 3.5 HP (Nissan and Merc 3.5 are same motor in fancier dress). I use 3.5 HP because 1)motor only weighs around 30 pounds, 2)at 5,000 - 8,000 ft. above sea level, I only get about 2.5 HP output, 3)never need more than 2/3 throttle (more throttle makes more noise / uses more fuel, and doesn't go any faster), 4)2.5 HP would work, but does not have a gearshift. The motor has plenty of power even when motoring into stiff winds and nasty chop.Other considerations:Weight: 30 lbs vs. 58 lbsShaft Length: Long shaft (20") vs. standard (15")- even with long shaft on a smaller lake, motorboat wakes and large waves can partially lift the prop out of the water. I don't think the B&S is available in long-shaft.Fuel tank: Built-in vs. an external tank (do you really want to have a fuel tank sitting in your boat?)Cost: about even, especially via internet (onlineoutboards.com has treated me fair).Transmission: F-N vs. F-N-R. Reverse is nice, but swinging the motor around works fine.If you are determined to go with a heavy motor, call the factory (HCT) and talk to Lind about the optional brace that ties forward into the seat. Or, if you want to use a standard 15" shaft, call about the optional low engine mount.The Honda 2 HP 4-stroke seems reasonable also - more expensive, though.