Don't buy the hype
I'm a sailor, winter alpine climber, tele skier, ice climber etc.. After spending nearly $600.00 on a Henri LLoyd jacket for an offshore trip I was sure glad I had my mountain climbing shell with me! I had a Patagonia three layer Gore-tex mountaineering jacket with me that I paid $229.00 for that blew away my $600.00 Henri Lloyd. Climbing jackets are designed to move freely. Your arms can move freely and the hood is articulated as well as the arms. They also have better venting and are lighter in weight. Wearing my Henri Lloyd was like wearing a firemans suit. Totally uncomfortable! It also did not breath worth a darn, and the fleece lined collar just collected salt spray and iritated my neck. The collar was so stiff it chaffed my ears til they bled. This was the point where I dug our my Patagonia. Granted it was a windy and wet trip but this is what the Lloyd stuff is supposed to be designed for and the hood was designed like it was an afterthought. Oh crap we forgot to put a hood on this jacket quick send a drawing to the guys in China before they go into production...????!!! The problem with my Henri LLoyd gear was freedom of movement, the non articulated hood and the fact that it fit like a trash can & breathed like a trash bag. A hood that can be stored in a collar like on most LLoyd & Musto etc. gear, by nature of the design, with heavy fabric, is not articulated. What is the point of a fleece lined collar when you can't build a hood that keeps water off the fleece? What does fleece do? It dries quickly and leaves the salt behind. What does salt do to your skin? It sucks the moisture out then your skin chaps and becomes raw. If LLoyd actually built a collar correctly, that had enough room for your chin to tuck into without strangling you, they would not need a fleece lining. If they built a hood that fit correctly & only your eyes and nose poked out when cinched down for extreme weather you could wear goggles over the hood and be totally dry like I have been in 85-100 mph winds in a freezing rain storm on NH's Mount Washington. When you turn your head from side to side to check wind conditions or whatever else in a LLoyd the hood mostly stays put and does not turn with your head so you look at the inside of the hood with at least one eye! The LLoyd hood did not even work well with ski goggles! Yes I said ski goggles.. If you've not been in rough enough weather to need them than forget I mentioned them but they do work incredibly well in nasty conditions and keep the salt spray out of your eyes. I always have a few pair on board because you never know when they might come in handy.Poor design, fit and function would NEVER be accepted in the alpine world nor would non articulated sleeves, lack of pit zip venting & over blown ballistic cloth material that prevents freedom of movement & breathability. The weight of the "offshore" ballistic type cloth is 98% unnecessary IMHO. I have yet to rip/abrade any jacket in 35 years of sailing and I've been in numerous offshore races and in some very, very nasty weather.I would have to say that backcoutry tele-skiing through the trees of the White and Green mountains challenges my gear substantially more than sailing and none of my alpine jackets are made of anywhere near the weight cloth as my LLoyd or Musto. The difference is the alpine gear manufacturers actually field test, and research, what the high wear points are and reinforce those points only to keep weight down and keep freedom of movement up. Yes I won't deny I have ripped a few alpine jackets but hitting a low hanging, dead branch of a spruce tree while backcounty tree skiing at 18-20 mph would rip any of my jackets including my LLoyd or Musto. The only thing most alpine climbing jackets lack is a wrist drip cuff and reflective tape. I wear a Mustang inflatable life jacket at night and in rough weather and it has reflective tape.. I also have a strobe on it so I don't really need it on my jacket too. I'll trade those two features any day of the week for far better freedom of movement, substantially higher breathability, articulated hood with multiple fit draw cords, articulated arms & superior ventialtion while remaining totally waterproof at less cost! Here's an idea before you buy a jacket jump in a pool with it on and see how tired you get treading water with the restricted movement of these jackets. Musto, LLoyd and the others need to learn a few things about designing gear & product testing before I'll lay down 600 clams for that over priced under designed "glamour gear" again... Check out the Patagonia site and look at the Skanorak & Chute To Thrill jackets. I own them both because the outlet is 10 minutes away and they are very comfortable and far more breathable than ANY "sailing" gear I've ever owned. I wear an older version of the Chute to Thrill more often than not but also love my Skanorak. Patagonia Link: http://www.patagonia.com/web/us/product/collection.jsp?OPTION=COLLECTIONS_DISPLAY_HANDLER&catcode=MAIN_SP07_US.CLOTHING_GEAR.MENS.JACKETS.HARD_SHELLAfter my Henri Lloyd debacle I decided to try a Musto and it too was a totaly uncomfortable poor breathing non articulated firemans suit. Since my two experiences I truly feel bad for people wearing "marine foulies". The design of the high altitude gear sold at Patagonia, The North Face, EMS, REI, Backcountry.com etc. etc. is meant to withstand winds of 80+mph snow, ice and freezing rain while remaining easy to move in and waterproof + breathable. Buy yourself a nice 3 layer Gore-tex shell from North Face, Patagonia, EMS, Mountain Hardwear, Arc'teryx, Cloudveil Marmot or one of the other quality names and you'll be fine, most likely pay less and be far more comfortable. A sailboat can;t dish out neraly the punishment that I give my jackets when climbing or backcountry skiing through Spruce trees..My wife wears an Arc'teryx shell and absolutely loves it! Plus it's cut for a woman. Backcountry.com is a great place to buy from if you have not! Remeber to size a shell so you can layer under neath it if necessary.