The rule of thumb sounds valid to me
Dave, I think that the HP to boat weight rule of thumb is pretty valid and a good general rule to go by. I don't think that I would ever stick a 9.9 HP Johnson Sailmaster on my 222 because it's not only overkill, but it's a heavier engine than the 8, and they had electric start, which I didn't need. What I really needed was the charging system that the Johnson Sailmaster 8HP had in it, which the 6 didn't have. I used to do a lot of night sailing every weekend during the boating season, and I needed to keep my 100 AH battery up for my nav lights, radio, and autopilot. Also, the Johnson had just come out with the shift control in front of the engine, which is a heck of a lot better than the shift on the side of the engine. So this is what gravitated me toward the Johnson Sailmaster 8 HP. At any rate, we all agree that Mark should have something larger than a 2 HP, and that an electric motor is out of the question for this boat. I should also add that he's going to need a long shaft and if he decides on a four stroke engine, he needs to make sure that his motor bracket is strong enough to support the weight of it, as the four strokes are heavier than the two strokes. I like two stroke outboards myself, and I hope that they continue to make them. Although, I'm told that they no longer make Johnsons and they continue to make Evinrude, which is OK with me. They were always the same identical engine with a different name on the engine cover. Joe