Rich, you are changing your story
You originally said Tightening the halyard will only draw the draft forward in the top portion of the sail" and "The cunningham better pulls the draft forward in the bottom panels and not much affect at the top/head".I said "The halyard pulls the whole luff tight and not just the top, and the cunningham does the same thing by pulling down , not just the bottom panels," and "That business about back-winding the main and the cunningham just moving the draft in the bottom of the sail doesn't make sense. The cunningham pulls the draft of the whole sail forward and flattens the main, and reducing the draft in the entire sail."Now you are making the general statement saying "A cunningham **MOVES the point or position of maximum draft**... more cunningham and the PT.oF Max draft goes forward, release the cunningham and the draft goes aft in the sail." -- That's more like what I said than what you saidNow when the draft does go forward it comes from somewhere and that is what helps to flatten the sail.Then you give a bunch of literary dialog about the bolt-rope and its friction, the luff section being rounded, making the sail unstable for back-winding, the necessity of opening the slot by moving the jib away because the luff is more rounded is all superfluous BS. Who are you trying to impress?Lets talk about the luff. You sound like you are trying to be convincing by the volume of your explanation. Most cruising boats use luff tapes instead of a bolt-rope and they are secured to the mast by slides or slugs which are supposed to slide easily in the track , or on the track, or in the slot with negligible friction. When a bolt rope is used it is sized so that it too has negligible friction. They are all designed to minimize any residual vertical load on the sail while holding the sail against the mast. Any discussion about sliding the luff to stretch it, from nothing at the fixed end, to a couple of inches at the stretching end, should discount any friction in the luff as it is meaningless. Your preoccupation with this friction creating any noticeable difference in the stretch at one end of the luff to the other is preposterous.You also said: "When you over tension the luff via a cunningham or halyard the LEECH trips open and that gives the 'impression' of a flatter sail.... but unless you pull the out-haul you don't get a flatter sail, just a sail with draft that moved FORWARD."---= and that is correct, but the thing of it is, that you should have already tightened the out-haul before you added some cunningham, and under these conditions the sail would flatten.My friend I know how to use a cunningham as well as you, so I don't need your descriptions of triangular pieces of cloth and bolt rope friction, open or closed leaches,rounded luffs, opening the jib slot, and the adverse affects of the cunningham to discuss installing a cunningham with someone who asks a simple question. I gave him a simple answer and then provided a simple alternative to use until he got the cunningham. You also gave him the same simple initial answer followed by a false explanation of why the alternative I gave him wouldn't work, and then a snow job about how you use a cunningham. Asking why did he need a cunningham. I thought it was BS then and still do. You used that point about opening the slot by moving the jib outboard without discussing that you could accomplish the same end by moving the draft in the jib forward by just tightening the jib halyard, if that point had any relevance to the question at hand. It appears to me that you are now doing more of the same.