And without the diesel smell.
While the idea of an electric motor driving your sailboat seems like a green idea and saving the planet action, the realities are a bit different. Many of the needed infrastructure are not in place. The actions taken today may actually speed up the issues that are used to blame diesel fuel as a bad thing.
This snipet from "
Producing batteries for a Green Technology."
In an effort to "reduce a carbon foot print", improve our smells and reduce the noise, we accepted the destruction of lives in other countries. Why not it is "saving the planet".
At the COP23 climate meeting, electric shuttles moved delegates across town, showcasing sustainable energy and green technology. But for farmer Zhang Tuling, green technology means dusty air and stunted crops.
Mr Zhang lives near a large mine in northern China that extracts a key ingredient for batteries: natural graphite. He can testify to the
hidden social and environmental toll of lithium-ion batteries - the very devices that enable renewable energy storage solutions, electric vehicles and mobile power.
The battery market is anticipated to be worth $100 billion by 2025. By 2040, batteries storing solar power for businesses and households will account for
57% of the world’s energy storage capacity.
The climate community has noticed. To keep global warming below 1.5 degrees,
100 million electric vehicles should be added to our roads globally by 2030, stated the 2015 Paris Agreement. This means a 50-fold increase from today’s numbers.
Paradoxically, realizing this goal could inflict unintended harm, on both humans and the environment. Discussions from last week’s COP23 in Bonn are making way for action. But in order for batteries to help rather than hinder our climate goals, the following five barriers must be addressed:
The carbon footprint of batteries in electric vehicles
Batteries powering electric vehicles are
forecast to make up 90% of the lithium-ion battery market by 2025. They are the main reason why electric vehicles can generate
more carbon emissions over their lifecycle – from procurement of raw materials to manufacturing, use and recycling – than petrol or diesel cars. Three factors account for this.
Image: International Energy Agency, Global EV Outlook 2017
Firstly, producing an electric vehicle contributes, on average,
twice as much to global warming potential and uses double the amount of energy than producing a combustion engine car. This is mainly because of its battery. Battery production uses a lot of energy, from the extraction of raw materials to the electricity consumed in manufacture. The bigger the electric car and its range, the more battery cells are needed to power it, and consequently the more carbon produced.
Secondly, once in use, an electric vehicle is only as green as the electricity that feeds its battery. A coal-powered battery is dirtier than a solar-powered battery. Governments can help by speeding up their transition to greener energy.
Thirdly, while an electric vehicle has a higher carbon footprint at the beginning of its lifecycle, it is typically cleaner once in use. Over time, it can catch up on the combustion engine car. The point at which an electric vehicle’s lifetime emissions break even with a combustion engine car also depends on the car’s mileage.
For example, in Germany - where about 40% of the energy mix is produced by coal and 30% by renewables - a mid-sized electric car must be driven for
125,000 km, on average, to break even with a diesel car, and 60,000 km compared to a petrol car. It takes nine years for an electric car to be greener than a diesel car, assuming an annual average mileage of 13,500 km (as was the case in
Germany in 2002, compared to 12,700 km in
England in 2013). Most consumers will have bought a new car by then. The case is similar in the
US, but less pronounced in nuclear-powered
France.
Unlocking the green potential of electric cars requires more than just increasing production. The system in which they operate must be sustainable too.
Pollution beyond carbon emissions
Battery production causes more environmental damage than carbon emissions alone. Consider dust, fumes, wastewater and other
environmental impacts from cobalt mining in the Democratic Republic of the Congo;
water shortages and
toxic spills from lithium mining in Latin America, which can alter ecosystems and hurt local communities; a heavily polluted river due to
nickel mining in Russia; or
air pollution in northeastern China, as mentioned above.
Batteries rely on graphite. Is the production of graphite harmless? No...