VC-17 here also....but why???
The first four years I owned my boat, it was in a wet slip in warm, fresh water. I chose VC-17 because of manufacturer claimed lower drag and potentially higher boatspeed. The yard had never heard of this product, so I had to furnish the paint. Two coats held up for almost three years. I was very pleased with it.However, I also learned that "antifouling" paint just deters hard growth like barnacles and crustaceans. It does NOT protect against slime and algae. For that you need paint with algaecide and slime blocker. Most of the newer paints now do (they didn't back then), So here's my question.In most fresh water areas (apart from those with zebra mussels) there's very litle to NO potential for hard growth...so why don't they sell freshwater bottom paint with just the algaecide and slime blockers and leave out the hard-growth biocides that we don't need? Is it too expensive to make up a special freshwater formula? Makes you wonder.Here's the ironic part. Now I keep my boat on a trailer in a very high fouling saltwater area, but I still use VC-17! Why? Because it stands up well to the rigors of trailering and it also contains metallic copper, which keeps its effectiveness against hard growth even after being out of the water for months, I also don't leave the boat in for very long each time (three to four days is about it). The paint's ging on two years now and still looks new.PeterH23 "Raven"