Sometimes I wonder if most of us in SoCal have been victim of a large con. Most of us, by my seat-of-the-pants measure, use a hard bottom paint. The majority of those, by the same measure, use a dive service. The most popular paint appears to be Trinidad. I typically get four years between haul outs, altho with the evolution of toxic mixes, the dive service has to increase in frequency sooner as the paint ages. So, here is my question: I wonder if we are just trading dollars compared to using an ablative? The dollar math goes something like this: for my 40', haul and paint two coats, three at the water line and leading edges of the keel and rudder = $2400 / 4 years = $600 per year. Dive service $50 per month X 12 months = $600. So, the monthly cost is about $100. It seems you guys in the more south eastern latitudes are getting about two years out of your bottoms which would equate to about a break-even comparison. Do you agree? Every month after that would be money in the bank. However, you don't get build-up, which is an advantage I think, altho the build up of epoxy may be a plus as it relates to blistering resistance. And, what about a hull scrub? Don't you have to have a dive service to scrub your prop and shaft and change zincs anyway? This is probably an academic question since I doubt most of us would change what works for us regardless. But, it becomes increasingly important as we are legislated away from copper based paints. Just curious what your take is on the matter. Rick D.