Sperrys vs Timbies
I used to swear by Sperrys till Timberland sent my dad a set of boat mocs in about 1979, gratis. It was part of their famous (or infamous) marketing survey by which they asked 'famous yachting personalities' to try and report on their first boat shoe. He filled out the attached questionaire by saying he liked them because the price was right. [typical]I wore those shoes after he did-- they lasted 8 years. Snobbily bought Sperrys after that. They lasted a year. So bought Timbies again. Lasted about 4-5 years. The Timbies are now being made as such junk that I only get a year or so out of each pair, but then I wear them constantly (yes, even with suits... sometimes). They do, however, hurt the feet as they are made so you feel the deck like you're not wearing shoes at all. Pacing concrete floors all day is NOT their best venue.(I have never tried Sebagos-- they always seemed expensive. Timberland have an outlet in Rehoboth-- boat mocs: $49.)Also-- before you turn up noses-- the traditional snob symbolism about deck soles representing money is only if they are BEAT. If the shoes look new or like they've never been immersed in salt water whilst on the feet, the wearer is probably a wanna-be, which has exactly the OPPOSITE appeal. The odd ripped stitch or worn corner is a plus. And of course they should NEVER be tied or untied in getting them on or off.By the way, that terminal yachtie, JFK, wore them on-duty in the USN and helped make them formally designated as 'alternative' to official Navy uniform, thus realising Admiral Sperry's dream. [wink]You'll always be in good company wearing real deck soles.JC