I do beg to differ and it isn't necessarily a political position. With all due respect, I think the statement you just made is a shallow platitude that makes no sense.
We don't, and never have had, a collective character and values. We are individuals with free thought and personal ambitions. The mere idea of collectivism is abhorrent and frightening to me. I have no desire to be bound by a collective 'morality'. The very idea that one person can represent that their own "character and values" is in conformance with the 'collective' and that anybody else whom doesn't agree is morally out-of-bounds is objectionable.
Of course we live within collective laws (that's necessary), but we also see how even our law-makers and our law-enforcers can't agree on how to interpret laws and they even go as far as breaking laws and/or ignoring laws.
Instead, I recognize that we all have individual desires, interpretations, and ambitions. We have a right to make ourselves happy and we don't necessarily all agree. What is good for me is not always good for you. In fact, what is good for me may be in extreme conflict with what is good for you. But we get to decide what is good for ourselves, not somebody else. We do have to live with compromise if we want to get along. I'll never express moral superiority for my opinions when they differ from yours. It doesn't mean I won't argue.