Wow, I never thought of that...
I lived through Betsy in New Orleans in 1965, Camille in '69 and a host of lesser Louisiana, Mississippi, Florida and even Maryland hurricanes for over fourty years. I was never flooded, and the longest I was without power or potable tap water was only two weeks, so maybe I don't have as much experience in hurricanes as some of you. But I gotta tell you, I hope no one on this forum has to live like the folks in New Orleans have this past week.What if you, and everyone you know, had lost their house, their job, had no utilities, no car, no clean and dry clothes, no food, no water, no public transportation, no police and fire protection, and no access to information... What would you do? Just to make sure we understand this... not only do you not have these things, they do not exist in your frame of reference. You do not have them. You know no one who has them. No one you know knows anyone who has them. This isn't about being between jobs, or having to tighten the belt for a few months, this is about having nothing but what you are wearing, and what you are weraing is dirty and wet. Most of us, certainly including me, have no concept of being without to that level. What would you do? What's the good advice? Share with each other? You have nothing. Loot? Other looters will shoot you. Walk out? Even if you could, where would you walk to? Based on what sound information? It's the number one mistake of people in survival situations. Don't get me wrong, I'm not a defeatist. The kid who stole the bus and made a run for Houston is a hero in my eyes; he got 70 folks out who otherwise might not have made it. But to expect everyone to be able to save themselves and others like that seems unreasonable. Heck, if it was easy, they wouldn't call it a disaster. For some, maybe most, sitting down and waiting for help may be the best bet for survival. Maybe that's being a realist. And yes, total dependency does yield total helplessness. But regardless of previous dependency, if you lose your home, have no car, no food, no water, no clean or dry clothes, no place to deficate or urinate, no police or fire protection, and no information, I think you may indeed meet the definition of helpless. I also don't think drowning in an attic is a sign of laziness. It is a sign of desperation. A man doesn't drown in an attic because he lazy. He drowns there because he can go nowhere else when the water comes. Should he have tried to swim out? Maybe, after all, everyone on this forum has has swimmed through a submerged house, right? But a better choice is to have an openable door or window in the attic to escape through. My house in New Orleans had one. An alternative is an axe in the attic. That swimming through the house stuff is for amateurs. I'm not trying to defend the choices made. To be sure, the best choice, and the only choice I would hope to make given these circumstances, is to evacuate the area altogether. Obviously, many did not. Lots of reasons for that, and maybe those will come out in the future for all of us to learn from. But I think it is a little arrogant, while people are likely still dying, to say some of the things written on this thread. I slept in a dry bed last night, my stomach was full, and I had plenty of clean, cool water to drink, so much that I had to get up at 3:00 to pee. I did not hear gunfire through the night, and I did not sleep in a room with a dead body. I wish the same for you.Have a great Labor Day Weekend. -Hooper Harris