I am inclined towards the dip pole jibe just because the pole is quite heavy and my foredeck is a slippery, trippery place. I have the mast track and all the equipment to do that. I have done both and dip pole seems easier and smoother.
Both end for end and dip pole jibes have the pole supported by the topping lift... so the weight of the pole should be less a factor than simply the handling of the spar. With a dip pole you need crew in the bow pulpit to change to the windward guy when the pole comes across.... you also need a mast man to raise the mast end of the pole up to allow the outboard end to "dip" below the forestay. In this case the pole is kept attached to the mast throughout the exercise, the topping lift can be fixed to the pole anywhere as can the foreguy... usually near the outboard end.... With the end for end, a bridle is rigged on the upper and lower sides of the pole..... to which the topping lift and fore guy are attached in the center axis of the pole... this allows the pole to spin freely and stay relatively level, while being supported completely by the topping lift... the height of the pole at the mast requires no adjustment as it does with a dip pole system
The advantage of the end for end is that a single foredeck crewman can execute the jibe simply standing near the mast... when the command is given the crew "trips" the outer jaw (there is a trip line for each end that makes that convenient). He then disengages the mast end jaw and slips in the new guy, pushes the pole out and clips in the old end to the mast....
The disadvantage of the end for end is that the larger the pole the more cumbersome it can be to actually spin it on the foredeck.... with the dip pole you have the extra crew at the bow, the mast man, and the trimmers handling the fore guy to get the pole around the deck into position,
I've noticed a few comments in this thread that talk about genoas and whisker poles...... a completely different animal,., However, on my boat, I still support the whisker pole with a topping lift and control its angle with a fore guy..... even though the pole is attached to the sail's clew and there is less torsion on it... being able to precisely set the pole is a huge advantage.