Guitars on a boat

SFS

.
Aug 18, 2015
2,070
Currently Boatless Okinawa
I always assumed that the difficulty of playing increased with the square of the number of strings.

Which is why I could only manage the drums.
 
  • Like
Likes: Will Gilmore
Jan 2, 2017
765
O'Day & Islander 322 & 37 Scottsdale, AZ & Owls Head, ME
Stu: which Epi?
Guild makes a great 12 string. Had one. Loved it.
 
Feb 3, 2015
299
Marlow Hunter 37 Reefpoint Marina Racine, WI
Alvarez Yairi 12 string
Martin x 2
Taylor
Gibson Les Paul Custom....yes, backed by a Marshall half stack.

Oh, and one Hunter 37.
 
Last edited:
Feb 20, 2011
7,993
Island Packet 35 Tucson, AZ/San Carlos, MX
I always assumed that the difficulty of playing increased with the square of the number of strings.
The lack of frets on certain instruments (4 string violins and their ilk) can really increase difficulties.
I have an early 20th century Gibson ukulele that my grandfather wooed my grandmother with, and a Yamaha classical guitar. Just sold the Takamine.
 
Jan 18, 2016
782
Catalina 387 Dana Point
Alvarez Yairi 12 strong
Martin x 2
Taylor
Gibson Les Paul Custom....yes, backed by a Marshall half stack.

Oh, and one Hunter 37.
Where do you keep a halfstack on a 37' boat? :) -- Sold my last 'real' amp a few years ago - a Dan Armstrong 4x12 Dan9 with a Dan head. Now just the crappy battery powered boat amp and a computer full of fake amps at home. Lots easier to move around.
 
Jan 18, 2016
782
Catalina 387 Dana Point
I always assumed that the difficulty of playing increased with the square of the number of strings.

Which is why I could only manage the drums.
12 strings are (imho) actually pretty easy to play - most guitar players they can just pick em up and play them. Not total mastery or anything, but play chords and stuff just fine.

Lack of frets is harder. I started out playing bass guitar, and later learned how to play string bass. A fretless was easy after that.
 

Joe

.
Jun 1, 2004
8,007
Catalina 27 Mission Bay, San Diego
I'm looking for a way to take an electronic keyboard/piano on board. I need to find a way to store it out of the way but convenient enough to pull out when the mood strikes.
I have a number of keyboards... but limit my boat axe to a Korg Krome workstation, 61 spring loaded keys,keeps the weight down. Has sequencer and arp, and you can plug in to laptop for more options. It's carried in a gig bag and stowed in the pilot berth. It doesn't have the feel and dynamics of 88 weighted keys but lugging a full size keyboard down the companionway is a disaster in the making.

If I were going to take it cruising, I'd get a hard shell case and pack it full of moisture absorbing packets. My old dock neighbor was a good guitar player, we used to set up in the cockpit and jam. He liked Al deMeola and Yngwe... I'm more Bill Evans, Oscar Petersen and Horace Silver.... so.. we met somewhere in the middle and butchered all the standards from the Real Book. Ah... those were the days. Neither of us ever left our instruments on the boat for any length of time.
I have a inexpensive, nylon string, single cutaway classical guitar that I'll take down on occasion. I've never left it down there...but if I did I would loosen the strings, keep it in the case with moisture packets.
 
Sep 20, 2014
1,320
Rob Legg RL24 Chain O'Lakes
I have a number of keyboards... but limit my boat axe to a Korg Krome workstation, 61 spring loaded keys, keeps the weight down. Has sequencer and arp, and you can plug in to laptop for more options. It's carried in a gig bag and stowed in the pilot berth. It doesn't have the feel and dynamics of 88 weighted keys but lugging a full size keyboard down the companionway is a disaster in the making.
You don't need weighted keys to get the action of weighted keys. Casio (of all people) has a mechanism that amplifies the mechanical load buy a factor of 4. The key moves about 3/4 inch, which moves a lever inside about 3". This gives the inertia feel of a real piano without the weight. I know a few well accomplished piano players who use the Casio as a sequencer, because they like the feel. (It also tends to work much better when you cover up the Casio name plate)
 
Oct 30, 2017
183
Catalina c 27 Lake Pueblo
I play for myself (and my wife and friends a little)
I do not enjoy playing for others.

A few weeks ago on the boat someone was looking at one of the abandoned boats next to ours while I was playing the Clash’s Bankrobber.
I was horrified when they asked if I wrote that song.

Not because they didn’t know the song but because I played and sang in front of someone I did not know. :what:

So I just need the song to be “ok”
 
  • Like
Likes: Will Gilmore

Joe

.
Jun 1, 2004
8,007
Catalina 27 Mission Bay, San Diego
You don't need weighted keys to get the action of weighted keys. Casio (of all people) has a mechanism that amplifies the mechanical load buy a factor of 4. The key moves about 3/4 inch, which moves a lever inside about 3". This gives the inertia feel of a real piano without the weight. I know a few well accomplished piano players who use the Casio as a sequencer, because they like the feel. (It also tends to work much better when you cover up the Casio name plate)
I would never buy a Casio.... sorry... they just don't have the sounds... and sound is the difference between a toy and a real instrument. ALL newer, pro quality spring loaded key instruments will have a "touch" adjustment... though not a weighted feel the dynamic changes.. which can actually emulate a weighted key... and all this is done electronically so the keyboards remain lightweight... Spring loaded keys are nice for pretty much everything except an acoustic piano... organ patches are played more realistically with plastic, springed keys, cause that's the nature of an organ... the dynamic is in the volume pedal.

Anyway, it's fun talking about 'em...
 

jwing

.
Jun 5, 2014
503
ODay Mariner Guntersville
News to me (and every guitar player or technician I've ever met).
What’s the “scientific accurate” support for your statements?
If you are genuinely interested in the physics of wood, read Understanding Wood, by R. Bruce Hoadly. I'd bet if you did, you wouldn't challenge what I previously wrote.

From Martin & Co.'s website:

PROPER CARE OF YOUR INSTRUMENT
HUMIDITY, TEMPERATURE AND STORAGE
Your instrument is made of thin wood which is easily affected by temperature and humidity. This combination is the most important single part of your instrument’s surroundings.
C. F. Martin recommends that you keep your instrument’s humidity level between 45-55% ...
Even though the Martin writer meant to say to keep the guitar's surrounding air between 45 and 55% relative humidity (RH), the real issue is what the wood's equilibrium moisture content (EMC) is. Wood shrinks as the EMC goes down and expands as the EMC goes up. It doesn't happen fast and the effect is not large, especially with quarter sawn lumber that is used in most good guitars. That is why RH cycles are OK for guitars, even rapid RH changes. Long exposures to RH extremes is what drives EMC to dangerous levels.

and temperature between 72-77 degrees Fahrenheit. If either humidity or temperature get far away from these conditions, your instrument is in danger.
Atmospheric temperature does not appreciably affect wood. However, Martin uses a finish that is sensitive to rapid warming if it has gotten thoroughly cold. Likewise, very high temperatures weaken the glue used in guitar-making. But not 78 or even 95 degrees Farenheit.

OK, let's leave the wood science behind for a moment and take Martin's care guide, and its good intentions, to heart. I don't read anything there that states or infers that all humidity above 40% is good, nor do I see anything about avoiding rapid changes in the RH of the surrounding air. That paranoia is rampant on guitar forums, but is simply not valid.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes: justsomeguy
Jan 2, 2017
765
O'Day & Islander 322 & 37 Scottsdale, AZ & Owls Head, ME
Thanks for your input, jwing - very interesting.
Since I’m not an expert, I think I’ll stick to the advice of the folks from Nazareth (in more ways than one).
 

DArcy

.
Feb 11, 2017
1,704
Islander Freeport 36 Ottawa
I would never buy a Casio
I bought a Celviano (Casio) piano, mostly because it was the best sounding, nicest feeling, electric piano in the price range. Sure, if you pay twice as much you can get a bit better sound but I'm not a professional so I'm not that fussy. The Celviano feels and sounds MUCH nicer than my old school acoustic piano. Better key action, much richer and fuller sound. Similar to photography, cheap electronics have outpaced the analog world so we can now get much better results with less money. Sure, if you spend 10x (100x...) as much you can get better acoustic equipment but bang for your buck, cheap electronics are significantly better.
For guitars (back to the original thread) I bought a cheap pawn shop guitar with some friends when we were backpacking. It was good for sitting around the camp fire but not the sweetest sound. It did have surprisingly good action. I wouldn't take my Takamine on the boat but I do have an old Yamaha FG-331 I've considered sailing with. Surprisingly full sound for a smaller guitar and really fun to play.
 
Jan 19, 2010
12,377
Hobie 16 & Rhodes 22 Skeeter Charleston
... I do have an old Yamaha FG-331 I've considered sailing with. Surprisingly full sound for a smaller guitar and really fun to play.
I got one of those off of Craigs List and gave it to my daughter as her first acoustic. I agree with you. It has a very nice sound for such a low-end guitar. The one I got was solid black. Later .... after she got rather good on the guitar, I purchased her a very nice Ibanez (electric-acoustic) and traded her for the Yamaha. The Yamaha is now my knock-about guitar.
 

genec

.
Dec 30, 2010
188
Pacific Seacraft Orion27 HP: San Diego, M: Anacortes
The trick to learning to play is not actually learning how to finger chords or run scales ...but rather.... getting your fingers to do what your brain is telling them to do. I've taught a bunch of people to play and there is a moment (usually about 3 weeks in) where a person suddenly can play and then they accelerate fast. I think it takes about three weeks for the fingers to learn to obey the signals from the brain. Most people give up before they hit that magic moment. Once your fingers start working then all you need to do is learn to read a chord diagram. It is harder to learn on an acoustic because the strings hurt your fingers at first. Electric guitar strings don't require as much pressure to fret.

SO! work with a song that you really enjoy so you will stick with it long enough to hit the magic moment.

I usually have my "pupils" start with "A long way to the top" by AC/DC because it is mostly a single chord (A) that you hammer on then pull off so you are forced to practice hitting the correct strings over and over and over again. It is a great way to train your brain. Once you get your fingers to behave, learning a new chord is not hard. Most songs have only three chords in them anyway. Chords down near the tuning pegs are called "open" chords. Once you get those down, you can play most folk songs and anything that Dillon wrote...then you will graduate to bar chords. That takes a different type of hand strength that most people don't have but once you develop the hand strength, bar chords are the easiest way to play guitar. If you learn to bar chord you can start playing "box patterns". Almost all rock & blues songs are some variation of a box pattern so once you get that down, you can usually play along with anybody, and almost all Cream, ZZ-top songs are box pattern variations... you just need to know what key your are in... or in other words, which "box" to play.... (Cream = E; ZZ-Top = G) that opens up a whole lot of songs to you... next is power chords and last is scales (if you want to do leads).
Interesting insight into the finger thing. I have "old fingers" and never really learned to play anything... but in the last year and a half my wife has been insisting that I learn the Uke. Well indeed my first issue was getting my fingers first "tough" and then second... able to go where I told them to go. Hell, I can touch type like a madman... but getting fingers to go where I want on a small fretboard has been a royal pain. (and I really mean pain...) Just playing for a half hour to an hour is painful in my forearm... Those left hand muscles have never had to work independently like that before. Developing muscle memory is taking some serious time.

I have gotten to the point now that when I play I try to find shortcuts in my finger placement for the next chord... to make the transition smoother and faster. Quite a few chords are really a wide stretch for my fingers... Ab on Uke for instance.

I am finally starting to see progress... but it really does take some serious time and effort to get those fingers to work in that manner.

BTW Guitar on a boat... ha! Gotta small boat... we bring Ukes. GRIN
 
  • Like
Likes: rgranger
Feb 3, 2015
299
Marlow Hunter 37 Reefpoint Marina Racine, WI
If you are genuinely interested in the physics of wood, read Understanding Wood, by R. Bruce Hoadly. I'd bet if you did, you wouldn't challenge what I previously wrote.


Even though the Martin writer meant to say to keep the guitar's surrounding air between 45 and 55% relative humidity (RH), the real issue is what the wood's equilibrium moisture content (EMC) is. Wood shrinks as the EMC goes down and expands as the EMC goes up. It doesn't happen fast and the effect is not large, especially with quarter sawn lumber that is used in most good guitars. That is why RH cycles are OK for guitars, even rapid RH changes. Long exposures to RH extremes is what drives EMC to dangerous levels.


Atmospheric temperature does not appreciably affect wood. However, Martin uses a finish that is sensitive to rapid warming if it has gotten thoroughly cold. Likewise, very high temperatures weaken the glue used in guitar-making. But not 78 or even 95 degrees Farenheit.

OK, let's leave the wood science behind for a moment and take Martin's care guide, and its good intentions, to heart. I don't read anything there that states or infers that all humidity above 40% is good, nor do I see anything about avoiding rapid changes in the RH of the surrounding air. That paranoia is rampant on guitar forums, but is simply not valid.
I am not a wood expert, but will follow a manufacturers requirements to a “t”. I have a Taylor 415cethat cracked while I was playing it at home. I keep my home in the recommended range and have several humidity monitors. I had to take photos of the the monitors and the whole home humidifier to prove to Taylor it was kept at the appropriate humidity. They repaired it for free. If I hadn’t followed their rwcommends, it would not have been covered. So, if you are leaving your guitar onboard for any lengthy time, you need to keep it in range or use an HPL or carbon fiber model. If for a weekend, don’t worry about humidity.