Have you found it yet? I had a chance to look at my boat and the valve for the head is in the battery compartment next to the rudder well, and it is labeled.I checked the manual, the boats manual reads like a comic book, not very technical. The toilets manula is a little ambiguose too. I went back and under to where the holding tank is but there is no valve to be seen other than for the ballast tank. A third white house runs into the head compartment from somewhere and is obviously meant to supply water but I can find the other end of it where the valve or thru-hull. I'll keep reading the books, over and over, but for now this has me stumped.
Did you get a sail up?OK I will look thanks. Tried to take her out last evening in 1-3 ft waves with 20 knots of wind. She didnt do so well. The centerboard may be weighted and the ballast tank was full of course; but the 3 ft waves rolled around pretty good so I turned back. I guess she's just not meant for those conditions. Lake Michigan can be a nasty witch sometimes.
Is that with board/rudder down and sails up? Mine with the board/rudder down, and sails up is very stable in those conditions. Under power it is a typical power boat and it rolls with the waves, but the board and sail dampen everything out.She seems a little tender in 2 ft waves and wind over 10 knots, a lot of rolling. Am I doing something wrong or is it just a light air sailing boat since its a hybrid? Of course I am a relatively new sailor as well.
Having any sail up would help dampen out the roll of the boat, but until you are really comfortable it is a good idea not to scare yourself or your passengers. I have found that this boat sails very nice in about 8 knots as long as the direction is constant with no gust. But that is a rare occasion. When I go out and the winds are questionable I will put my sails up in phases; starting with the jib. If that is good I will furl the jib and put the main up, and if the boat and my wife can handle more I will put the jib up again. Also, don't hessitate to reef the main or sail with a partially furled jib, at least until you are confortable.Yes, I'm a novice still. Have only been sailing 3 summers now. But I did have the tank full and baord down, I just chickened out and went back into the harbor before I put sails up. So I didnt know if sails up would make it seem less rolley-polley.
This is incorrect. Hunter quotes the weight of the Edge as 4920lb including the trailer and ALL optional equipment like the 75HP motor (320lbs), fuel tank with fuel, marine head, 20gal water tank, etc.The Hunter edge with the trailer is in excess of 6000 lbs which falls into the class 4 tow range.
The difference in quality, fit and finish is exactly what convinced me to sell my 26M and buy an Edge. I definitely feel like it was worth the extra $ for the sizeable difference in these aspects of the boat. That and although it is only 6in longer and 6in wider the Edge seems roomy and palatial compared with the 26M because IMO it has a better layout.Thanks for the honest opinion, sounds like the boat for me. I have a Mac 26X and have had a blast with it for the last 4 years, however, I was never really impressed with the lack of quality for creature features and sail hardware. Hunter boats have always been in my opinion several steps above the Mac in quality and design. I have been looking to upgrade to a better trailerable sail boat and with you felt the Oden was way to expensive for what it is. Time to sell the Mac and get the Edge!
The difference in quality, fit and finish is exactly what convinced me to sell my 26M and buy an Edge. I definitely feel like it was worth the extra $ for the sizeable difference in these aspects of the boat. That and although it is only 6in longer and 6in wider the Edge seems roomy and palatial compared with the 26M because IMO it has a better layout.
I might agree on the interior of the Edge having a difference in quality as this was something I saw first hand at the boat show. The Edge was roomier and had a more finished feel in the iterior with the extra wood finishes.
Not so on the exterior, I got the distinct impression that the mast and rigging were some sort of after thought. There were absolutely no sail trim controls, no jib track to adjust the clew of the jib forward and aft, just a goofey little pulley block bolted into the deck for the jub sheet to thread through to the cockpit, definitely not a quality set-up nor is the cheap roller furler they supply, I'd rather buy a decent aftermarket one.
There is absolutely no genoa track on the cockpit combing and I doubt the combing was built strong enogh to accomodate installing one, you are stuck with only a jib, too bad.
No traveller! My bad what were they thinking, my 26M has one. I hardly think that there is any even remote possibilty that the Edge has better quality rigging. The Edge was conceived as 70% powerboat and 30% sailboat whereas the MacGregor was conceived as 40% powerboat and 60% sailboat, huge difference in conceived design strategies, The Mac is simply a superior sailing vessel.
I only wish Hunter had announced it sooner since if they had I would have waited the few months and just gotten the Edge. As a result I took a hit on selling the 26M but I'm so much happier with the Edge than with the Mac. In my book this was a no brainer because I value quality. Unlike some Mac owners I've encountered who say things like "a MacGregor is never finished there is always something to work on" (which I consider as a bit of self delusion meant to justify in their own minds all the work they have to do on their Macs) I prefer sailing on my boat to working on it. I didn't have to spend even a fraction of the time I've spent on the 26M on the West Wight Potter 19 I owned for over 6 years.
So far the only time I've spent on the Edge is adding options I chose to add myself to save a little $ to compensate a little bit for the bath I was taking on selling off the 26M. Even at that I have spent only a small fraction of the amount of time on my Edge that I had to spend on the Mac.
Guess I'm glad to hear that I'm not the only person to feel this way and perhaps may not be the only person to have owned a Mac and ditched it in favor of the Edge.
Hi guys, I got a question for you all, I have just purchased a new used 2009 Edge and have a leak problem. Water is accumluating aft next to the holding tank for the toilet. The through valve is next to the tank ( opposite side of the batteries which are on the starboard side). Seems that the water (about 1 1/2 gal.) is originating around the head and holding tank as the carpet in the head is wet. Under sail we discovered this on a port tack healing to starboard, water was under the sink and cabinet like crazy. All through holes don't appear to be leaking although the intake valve for the head could be wet, can't tell yet as we just discoverd the water on our maiden voyage. This boat has sat for a year, could sealant dry up over this amount of time not in use? Any advise would be much appreciated.There is a valve that draws outside water for the toilet; check your manual to see which one it is. Also, concerning the valves - put lock-tite on all of the nuts holding the handles on. One of mine fell off, and the others were loose. Let me know what Hunter says about the toilet, because I am not totally sure that mine is working correctly.
so trueAll boats power or sail, Edge or Mac require some modifications to suit the individual buyer, there is no one shoe fits all boat. We all do things to our boats to suit are own individual needs.
I took the MacFurler with the 150% Genoa I had on it off the 26M before I sold it. With the simple addition of a Johnson Quick Release Shroud Lever that cost me $75 I had the thing installed and working in minutes. Now I really don't like the MacFurler because I find that the drum line doesn't wind well onto it and is constantly binding, but it was paid for and given how much of a loss I ended up taking on the 26M I figured I'd keep it for now.The Edge requires major work to accomodate a Genoa sail,
Gee wish I'd known sooner, I'd have sold you mineThere is no way on God's green earth the Edge justifies the huge increase in price over a Mac for the slightly better interior and vastly inferior rigging and sail set up. You could not give me the Edge for free, I'd rather pay for a Mac.
hmm, I sure didn't notice that. In fact I found my Edge handles a lot better than the 26M. Unlike MacGregor's rinky dink daggerboard the Hunter's swing keel does a lot better job of keeping the boat from slipping across the line of travel when the wind is abeam. The extra weight wrt to the overall freeboard means that it comes about better. And I've gotten my Edge as fast as 7.5mph in a 15mph (that's true speed over ground measured on a GPS) breeze without really trying. I never got the 26M to go over 6.6mph.but we all know the Edge can't sail.
All the specs, including the actual towing weight with *ALL* options including fuel (at 48lbs for 6 gal), potable water (160lb for 20 gal in the optional tank) and the 75HP Evinrude (which weighs about 320lb if I recall the Evinrude spec correctly) are listed on Hunter's website and in the glossy data sheet they hand out at the boat shows. They indicate it as 4920lbs when fully loaded, which covers quite most of the heavier items one might add to a boat.PS, The dealer at the boatshow was who I got the weight specs from, hence my recommendation for a heavier tow vehicle.