Thank you everyone who responded to my original post above. I am the Score-Keeper/PHRF Committee Lead at our club in Indianapolis, and was curious to see what type of feedback from other sources that I would receive in response to a very high level concept that a few of us were tossing-around last weekend during our 2017 racing program planning meeting. Our Club has a growing racing program, and the non-spinnaker fleet size is now just as large, and slightly larger, than our spinnaker fleet that has dominated the racing for over a decade.
Two years ago, our club launched a new "Boat of the Year" program that allowed spinnaker and non-spinnaker boats to pursue the award on fairly level playing field. It involves some unique scoring work to bring a balance to PHRF and Participation. The first year, a J24 (spinnaker) won the award. Last year, I won the award in a non-spinnaker Catalina 22 Sport. The BOTY program has proven successful by demonstrating in its first two years that spinnaker and non-spinnaker boats can compete for top racing recognition, while racing in separate fleets with different configurations, and not be 100% dependent on the limitations of PHRF.
The feedback posted above was useful, because it reinforced my known limitations of PHRF, while allowing me to poke around to see if anybody was doing something new, different or unique with respect to PHRF rating adjustments for mix-configurations.
Two years ago, our club launched a new "Boat of the Year" program that allowed spinnaker and non-spinnaker boats to pursue the award on fairly level playing field. It involves some unique scoring work to bring a balance to PHRF and Participation. The first year, a J24 (spinnaker) won the award. Last year, I won the award in a non-spinnaker Catalina 22 Sport. The BOTY program has proven successful by demonstrating in its first two years that spinnaker and non-spinnaker boats can compete for top racing recognition, while racing in separate fleets with different configurations, and not be 100% dependent on the limitations of PHRF.
The feedback posted above was useful, because it reinforced my known limitations of PHRF, while allowing me to poke around to see if anybody was doing something new, different or unique with respect to PHRF rating adjustments for mix-configurations.
Last edited: