FCC Released: Sept. 1, 2016 Re: VHF Marine Radio Use Ashore

Jul 27, 2011
5,002
Bavaria 38E Alamitos Bay
Just found about this! (Scroll down to italics.)
Who else knows? KG

G. Portable Marine VHF Radios on Shore.

Section 80.115(a)(2) of the Commission’s Rules prohibits the use on shore of a portable marine VHF radio associated with a vessel. The GMDSS Task Force proposed that the rule be amended to allow persons on shore within three miles of the water to use portable marine VHF radios to communicate with the vessel that is subject to the ship station authorization. The Commission, however, noted that limitations on the use of maritime frequencies are intended to minimize interference to maritime communications (particularly distress and safety messages), and tentatively concluded that permitting the use of portable marine VHF radio transmitters on shore would not further the public interest.

We questioned the practical enforceability of a three-mile rule, and asked whether shore parties’ communications needs could be met by commercial mobile radio service (CMRS) or PRS options. The Commission also asked commenters supporting the proposal to discuss what limitations would be appropriate to minimize the impact on maritime communications. The GMDSS Task Force acknowledges that CMRS options likely will be preferred in areas with reliable coverage, and asserts that this makes it unlikely that use of low-powered portable marine VHF radio radios on land will interfere with maritime communications. It also argues that permitting such use will further the public interest by encouraging more boaters to a carry a VHF radio, which has safety benefits not available from CMRS or PRS options because marine VHF channels can be used to contact the Coast Guard and other nearby vessels in a distress situation, for bridge-to-bridge communications, and to receive maritime safety information broadcasts.


We agree with commenters that the public interest will be served by allowing the use of portable VHF radios ashore, so long as it is limited to enhancing the usefulness of marine VHF radios without negatively affecting maritime communications. Such limited onshore use will promote flexibility in the use of marine radio equipment in a manner that furthers maritime safety by encouraging more boaters to a carry a VHF radio. Specifically, as suggested by ACR, we will permit use of portable marine VHF radios only in areas adjacent to the water, such as docks and beaches. In addition, as suggested by RTCM, and consistent with our requirements for offshore use, onshore communications using such radios must relate to the operational and business needs of the associated vessel, and must be limited to the minimum practicable transmission time. We amend Section 80.115 accordingly. We caution operators that the Commission’s Enforcement Bureau will continue to investigate complaints against operators who improperly use marine VHF radios, particularly any violation that concerns unauthorized transmissions on 156.800 MHz (VHF Channel 16).

https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-16-119A1.pdf
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes: dlochner
Jan 11, 2014
11,421
Sabre 362 113 Fair Haven, NY
Thanks. Great Information. Now what many of us have been doing is legal.

There are other significant changes contained in the report and regulatory changes with regards to EPIRBS and other emergency locator beacons. A lot of product will be on the shelves that no longer meets the requirements. Expect these items to be placed on deep discount for the unwary.
 
Jul 27, 2011
5,002
Bavaria 38E Alamitos Bay
Thanks. Great Information. Now what many of us have been doing is legal.
True--in some cases; but I do use, and have used, walkies for ship to shore communication when cruising the islands, and when Admiral and I are ashore in a place where our cell phones don't work for us (e.g., Mexico and Canada).
 

Hafa

.
Jan 24, 2017
28
Hunter 40.5 Saipan
...There are other significant changes contained in the report and regulatory changes with regards to EPIRBS and other emergency locator beacons. A lot of product will be on the shelves that no longer meets the requirements. Expect these items to be placed on deep discount for the unwary.
The full report is available here. From a brief review of the relevant sections, it appears that the primary change to regulations affecting EPIRBs will be a requirement that they transmit GPS data; p3:

"Traditional EPIRBs rely on satellite Doppler shift to identify the distress location. Some EPIRBs, however, transmit their Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS)9 coordinates, which enables SAR authorities to determine an accurate location significantly faster than satellite Doppler shift.
4. EPIRBs must comply with the RTCM EPIRB standard incorporated by reference in our rules.10 RTCM updated its EPIRB standard to require, among other conditions, an internal navigation device designed to provide position data upon activation"

It also appears that non-compliant EPIRBs may still be used on non-commercial craft; p4:

"We agree with the commenters that no deadline is required for vessels that voluntarily carry EPIRBs"
 

Gunni

.
Mar 16, 2010
5,937
Beneteau 411 Oceanis Annapolis
Early EPIRBs interfaced with an external GPS - when you lifted it from it's cradle and pulled the trigger you were stuck with the last recorded GPS position. After that it was radio direction finding rescue. If you have one of these antiques, ditch it and get one of the new state of the art EPIRBs that allow you to change your batteries.

I don't see anything good of the new relaxed VHF radio rules, the frequencies are already too full of idle chit cha. If this continues people will be de-incentivised to monitor the channels or run scans.
 
Jul 27, 2011
5,002
Bavaria 38E Alamitos Bay
Well, if you're close to your vessel when ashore (which you should be), perhaps can just step on other traffic if it's nonsense and you have real business to do, etc. This does not solve the problem, however, that you mention.
 
Jan 19, 2010
12,370
Hobie 16 & Rhodes 22 Skeeter Charleston
So every time I hailed a dock master in the past, the dock master was breaking the law?

Interesting.
 
  • Like
Likes: Parsons
Jan 11, 2014
11,421
Sabre 362 113 Fair Haven, NY
So every time I hailed a dock master in the past, the dock master was breaking the law?

Interesting.
Depends if the marina had a shore station license. If they have a shore station license, then they are probably legal.

In the report, one of the justifications for the new VHF rule was it would increase the number of installed VHFs, which they determined was a good thing.

If folks behaved, used low power and kept the chat relevant, then it will work. But there will always be some who abuse it, and those are the ones abusing it now.
 
Jul 27, 2011
5,002
Bavaria 38E Alamitos Bay
So every time I hailed a dock master in the past, the dock master was breaking the law?

Interesting.
No-- he might have had a station license. I believe the law basically said that a vessel's station license (if possessed) did not cover transmissions from land on a hand-held VHF. Marine (VHF) land-based transmissions, I believe, are still not generally allowed w/o a station license, EXCEPT now for the situation described in the Release. Some time ago the FCC waived the requirement for a station license aboard recreational vessels of US registry operating in US territorial waters.
 
Last edited:
Sep 25, 2008
7,096
Alden 50 Sarasota, Florida
An academic exercise which changes nothing regarding use of handhelds which have historically been used regardless of a prohibition most didn't know/still don't know existed.

For those who did know it was a 'no-no' to use it onshore, they also appreciate proper use and restraint.