the bulkhead next to the compression post won't support any weight. Plywood has near zero compressive strength on edge. the design of the boat is to transfer all downward force of the mast to the keel via the compression post and then the compression block directly underneath.Even if the base of the mast compression post/ block is degraded by rot, the mast is also supported by the adjacent main bulkhead. Also if you look at the cabin roof it has a large ridge of fiberglass "rib" which also tabs in the bulkhead and helps absorb and displace some of the load of the mast to the hull. My C 30 also has an optional mast tabernacle base made of steel that is through bolted & helps take some of the compression load / mast pumping pressure. All of these areas help take the load of the mast, but I agree that compression post is a critical element, or the cabin top may suffer cracking and sagging. Honestly when I think about it, the mast plate that my mast rests upon may very well be hiding cracks that aren't visible. The hinged plate was really designed to assist in raising & lowering the mast but it also helps to support the base quite a bit.
The mast must come down.. Way too much weight to risk not stepping it.. It's in the Procedures that Catalina has for the job.Team118 said:I'm curious. Does the mast have to come down to tackle the compression block?
Could I loosen the shrouds enough to give an 1" or so play and then cut out the old block. Perhaps build a temporary post to spread the weight of the mast onto the floor while I'm working on the old block and installling the new one?
I didn't take the mast down this winter but I would certainly look at tackling this project over the next few weeks.
Otherwise, it'll go on the list.
I have never seen a picture of the aluminum beam support used after #5397. Are they glassed in, under the post? I wonder if they used plywood as filler for the void between the structure? Regardless, I wouldn't worry after #5397. Any plywood in that area isn't structural. And if you haven't seen keel movement or a "Smile", I wouldn't worry about plywood in the flat part of the bilge (bearing the keelbolts), either.I'm a little confused. If the post is metal why would there be a wooden block inside it? I haven't seen any signs of a problem but will I?
I have hull #5861, and my mast sits on a metal post--if you're referring to that plate that holds the mast in place.Bad Obsession said:In MKii an improvement was that the compression post was changed from wood to metal. The original wood post lead the the "bird bath" at the foot of the mast.
My hull number is 5800 and when it was surveyed I had the area around the mast checked well because I had read of the "bird bath" from earlier models. I didn't have one present.
There's a 1988 C-30 at my marina here in Nashville that has just had the same repair; I didn't see his compression post, but I suspect it's just like the one on my 1990. The guy fixed it by creating a new foundation of fiberglass, which he sanded down and then reset the mast. He had pulled the mast up about a foot for the repair.Bad Obsession said:I am hull number 5800. I know that I have a metal compression post. That block may just be a filler.....Why set a metal post on a wooden block that will end up rotting away because it will see water. They didn't seal the block either.
Actually, not true; the guy here made a sort of a-frame on the boat, loosened the shrouds, and lifted the mast about a foot so he could make the repair. He didn't take the mast down, but made a new foundation of fiberglass, onto which I assume he put the compression post. I saw it before he lowered the mast, but before he replaced the post, took him about a week...BillyK said:The mast must come down.. Way too much weight to risk not stepping it.. It's in the Procedures that Catalina has for the job.
That sounds pretty amazing. He had to lift the mast with a crane, right? And suspended it vertically, one foot above the deck? The shrouds were loose for a week and, long enough to remain attached to the chainplates?Actually, not true; the guy here made a sort of a-frame on the boat, loosened the shrouds, and lifted the mast about a foot so he could make the repair. He didn't take the mast down, but made a new foundation of fiberglass, onto which I assume he put the compression post. I saw it before he lowered the mast, but before he replaced the post, took him about a week...
Bob
No, he didn't use a crane at all; he made a neat triangular frame with 2x4's; he used ropes, tied them to the cleats on the mast I think, lifted the mast off the compression plate. I was considering buying that boat, so that was how I came to look at it.rbmcintire said:That sounds pretty amazing. He had to lift the mast with a crane, right? And suspended it vertically, one foot above the deck? The shrouds were loose for a week and, long enough to remain attached to the chainplates?
Nah, pics or it didn't happen... I'm losing something in translation here...
Was this repair down in the bilge or did the guy repair the fiberglass underneath his metal deckplate, up on deck? If so, he may wonder why it sunk down?There's a 1988 C-30 at my marina here in Nashville that has just had the same repair; I didn't see his compression post, but I suspect it's just like the one on my 1990. The guy fixed it by creating a new foundation of fiberglass, which he sanded down and then reset the mast. He had pulled the mast up about a foot for the repair.
Bob
Well..., sounds dangerous and the same as pulling the mast. Just that he chose to store the mast 1 foot above the boat rather than on the deck or on land. Ether way the weight needs to be removed.longterm said:Actually, not true; the guy here made a sort of a-frame on the boat, loosened the shrouds, and lifted the mast about a foot so he could make the repair. He didn't take the mast down, but made a new foundation of fiberglass, onto which I assume he put the compression post. I saw it before he lowered the mast, but before he replaced the post, took him about a week...
Bob
I think he removed the deck plate, because I vaguely recall his telling me he was going o put it back after he sanded the glass flat...rbmcintire said:Was this repair down in the bilge or did the guy repair the fiberglass underneath his metal deckplate, up on deck? If so, he may wonder why it sunk down?
Didn't look dangerous, actually; this guy works on all the boats at our marina, so he's a bit of an expert at boat repair, painting, etc. I'll be using him to work on mine as needs arise.BillyK said:Well..., sounds dangerous and the same as pulling the mast. Just that he chose to store the mast 1 foot above the boat rather than on the deck or on land. Ether way the weight needs to be removed.